Liberty gets the provider instance from CDI. W CWWKW1002W: The CDI scope of JAXRS Provider ValidationExceptionMapper is. W CWWKW1002W: The CDI scope of JAXRS Provider UnknownUrlExceptionMapper is. W CWWKW1002W: The CDI scope of JAXRS Provider GenericExceptionMapper is. W CWWKW1002W: The CDI scope of JAXRS Provider BusinessExceptionMapper is. W CWWKW1002W: The CDI scope of JAXRS Provider PortaleCookieFilterRest is. W CWWKW1002W: The CDI scope of JAXRS Provider FakeRestFilter is. Tracing information is sent to localhost:6831.Ĭom.ibm.ws. A CWWKZ0001I: Application ws-ids started in 39.529 seconds.Ĭom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.extension W SRVE0190E: File not found: /openapi/ui/ M.ibm.ws. I CWMOT1001I: A JaegerTracer instance was created for the ws-ids application. Io.jaegertracing.Configuration I Initialized tracer=JaegerTracer(version=Java-0.34.0, serviceName=ws-ids, reporter=RemoteReporter(sender=UdpSender(), closeEnqueueTimeout=1000), sampler=RemoteControlledSampler(maxOperations=2000, manager=HttpSamplingManager(hostPort=localhost:5778), sampler=ProbabilisticSampler(tags=, zipkinSharedRpcSpan=false, expandExceptionLogs=false, useTraceId128Bit=false) war is always the same, the one that's working on my first attempt, I checked to not have hard-coded path.Ĭom.ibm.ws. A CWWKT0016I: Web application available (default_host): .session.WASSessionCore I SESN0176I: A new session context will be created for application key default_host/idsWSĬom.ibm.ws.util I SESN0172I: The session manager is using the Java default SecureRandom implementation for session ID generation. I tried to copy the server from test environment on my laptop and using my. I tried with different version of the server, but nothing change. I tried to copy my server folder on another folder in my laptop, same problem. I tried to copy my exact folder on his laptop, same problem. Now I tried to do the same on a colleague laptop, but the application seems that is started, but when I call a rest endpoint I have no response, just an ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED from browser. Run the server through command line and the application is working. I have installed on my laptop a Liberty server, just unzipped, launched server create and copied some files from the remote server test environment and put a. I would definatelly prefer some more feasible and automated solution directly out of VB&R (to have possibility to allow "UUID Failover" for some protection groups. So far I cannot imagine which settings needs to be adjusted on Agent machine side.because obviously Agent is not installed on affected machine at all (because of UUID issue itself). It´s sad, because at the end, I will find out, that manual change of BIOS UUID via AMIDMI-like tool is easiest way (and it´s obviously not easy at all). So sorry to say that, but obviously they aren´t even sure, what the failover process is. I have reopened case and got an answer, that they made a debug testing and there is indeed some other steps which needs to be done in order to make it running and they are working with QA team to define best mechanism. Support team provide me with an registry entry, which needs to be created on affected machine in order to switch mechanism to UUID failover.but tested in three locations and without success. It´s indeed nice solution.not a single word.but it has still so many issues to be solved, which is limitating us to use it for 100%. Therefore I would really apprecite, if there should be another identifier for Agent machines.Īnother thing is, that if you restore machine to new hardware, it will of course get new UUID and machine is then duplicated in VB&R and it makes quite a mess in console. It seems to be quite fine to use DMI tool to change UUID to unique one, but there is one issue, that we are using Veeam agents mainly for production PCs and it´s quite hard to find timeslot to shutdown machine and repair UUID with bootable stick. I am rolling out Veeam Agents project in our environment with more than 30 Veeam servers worldwide and found out UUID issue in every location. I think that whole decision to use UUID as only identifier for machines is quite unfortunate. Currently, by my opinion, there is only solution to request DMI tool directly from vendor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |